You must subscribe to access archives older
than one year.
Take a free trial of Briefing In Play® now.
Subscribe Here
TERMS OF USE

The Briefing.com RSS (really simple syndication) service is a method by which we offer story headline feeds in XML format to readers of the Briefing.com web site who use RSS aggregators. By using Briefing.com’s RSS service you agree to be bound by these Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the terms and conditions contained in these Terms of Use, we do not consent to provide you with an RSS feed and you should not make use of Briefing.com’s RSS service. The use of the RSS service is also subject to the terms and conditions of the Briefing.com Reader Agreement which governs the use of Briefing.com's entire web site (www.briefing.com) including all information services. These Terms of Use and the Briefing.com Reader Agreement may be changed by Briefing.com at any time without notice.

Use of RSS Feeds:
The Briefing.com RSS service is provided free of charge for use by individuals, as long as the feeds are used for such individual’s personal, non-commercial use. Any other uses, including without limitation the incorporation of advertising into or the placement of advertising associated with or targeted towards the RSS Content, are strictly prohibited. You are required to use the RSS feeds as provided by Briefing.com and you may not edit or modify the text, content or links supplied by Briefing.com. To acquire more extensive licensing rights to Briefing.com content please review this page.

Link to Content Pages:
The RSS service may be used only with those platforms from which a functional link is made available that, when accessed, takes the viewer directly to the display of the full article on the Briefing.com web site. You may not display the RSS content in a manner that does not permit successful linking to, redirection to or delivery of the applicable Briefing.com web site page. You may not insert any intermediate page, “splash” page or any other content between the RSS link and the applicable Briefing.com web site page.

Ownership/Attribution:
Briefing.com retains all ownership and other rights in the RSS content, and any and all Briefing.com logos and trademarks used in connection with the RSS service. You are required to provide appropriate attribution to the Briefing.com web site in connection with your use of the RSS feeds. If you provide this attribution using a graphic we require you to use the Briefing.com web site logo that we have incorporated into the Briefing.com RSS feed.

Right to Discontinue Feeds:
Briefing.com reserves the right to discontinue providing any or all of the RSS feeds at any time and to require you to cease displaying, distributing or otherwise using any or all of the RSS feeds for any reason including, without limitation, your violation of any provision of these Terms of Use or the terms and conditions of the Briefing.com Reader Agreement. Briefing.com assumes no liability for any of your activities in connection with the RSS feeds or for your use of the RSS feeds in connection with your web site.

Briefing.com
Subscribers Log In
 
  • HOME
  • OUR VIEW
    • Page One
    • The Big Picture
    • Ahead of the Curve
  • ANALYSIS
    • Premium Analysis
    • Story Stocks
  • MARKETS
    • Stock Market Update
    • Bond Market Update
    • Market Internals
    • After Hours Report
    • Weekly Wrap
  • CALENDARS
    • Upgrades/Downgrades
    • Economic
    • Stock Splits
    • IPO
    • Earnings
    • Conference Calls
    • Earnings Guidance
  • EMAILS
    • Edit My Profile
  • LEARNING CENTER
    • About Briefing.com
    • Ask An Analyst
    • Analysis
    • General Concepts
    • Strategies
    • Resources
    • Video
  • COMMUNITY
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • SEARCH
Login | Archive | EmailEmail |
HOME > Our View >The Big Picture >Political Reality Check
The Big Picture Archive
Last Update: 23-Jan-12 09:08 ET
Political Reality Check

The impact of the South Carolina primary results are being blown way out of proportion by the media's need for up-to-the-second over-analyzing.  Mitt Romney, despite the South Carolina primary results, is still likely to be the Republican nominee for president.  President Obama is the favorite for re-election.  And the Republicans will hold the House and may well take the Senate.

South Carolina

The South Carolina primary results are a massive earthquake upending the global political order -- until the next debate or at most until the Florida primary on January 31.

Newt Gingrich won a solid 12-point victory in a state that neighbors his home base of Georgia.  It gives his campaign a much-needed boost.  Yet, it really isn't that surprising.

In November and December, before the Iowa caucuses, Gingrich led in the polls there by 15 to 20 points. 

At that time, it was conventional wisdom that Romney, a moderate Mormon from Massachusetts, had no chance to win in a conservative southern state such as South Carolina. 

Gingrich's win keeps him in the race, but still provides no indication that Gingrich can consistently challenge Romney outside of Gingrich's home base. 

Remember, Gingrich came in fourth in Iowa and fifth in New Hampshire. 

Romney came in second in Iowa, first in New Hampshire (near his home base) and second in South Carolina.  Romney still has a vastly superior organization, far more money than Gingrich, and results so far indicate a wider national appeal.

The results are far more devastating to Santorum. He finished fifth in New Hampshire, fourth in South Carolina, and is looking at third or fourth in Florida.  His Iowa victory is old news and he may not have the resources to continue after Florida.

Paul will continue on no matter what, but will not win the nomination.

The calendar now heats up fast and favors Romney. 

The Florida primary is January 31.  Maine and Nevada vote February 4.  Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri are February 7.  Arizona and Michigan are February 28.  Then there are a slew of primaries in March, including 11 on March 6.

If Gingrich loses Florida, he may have trouble continuing a viable campaign.  Maine, Nevada, Colorado, and Minnesota are all more favorable to Romney than Gingrich.  If Romney wins Florida, he could quickly put together a string of victories that puts Gingrich's South Carolina win in the same category as Santorum's Iowa victory -- a temporary boost that didn't alter the basic dynamics.

The South Carolina results certainly make for a more interesting race:  it isn't over. 

The political reporters don't have to pack their bags and head back to DC.  They get to continue on the trail and keep dreaming about writing the next "The Making of the President."

Nevertheless, Romney remains a strong favorite to garner the nomination.  The intrade.com website, which allows betting on political events, has Romney as a 69% favorite to be the GOP nominee.

The Presidential Race

There will be talk that the Obama administration is thrilled that the Republican primary is continuing, and that candidates are beating up on each other.

This is undoubtedly true, but not meaningful in the long term. 

Baseball spring training, the full regular season, and the World Series will be played before the November election.  The new NFL season will be well underway, as will the next NBA season.  The election is a long way off.  And in politics, as the swings in South Carolina show, a couple of weeks can be a lifetime.

If Romney wraps up the GOP nomination by mid-March, there will be plenty of time for the Republican Party to coalesce.  There will be plenty of time to "inoculate" the issue of Romney's wealth. 

The issues of today will fade, much as Obama's Jeremiah Wright problem faded.  The myopia in politics is no different than in the stock market. The stock market thought the nuclear problem in Japan would define profits for years, and then forgot about the issue a few months later. 

The race for the presidency will start anew in the spring, and not heat up until September.   And Obama will have distinct advantages.

First, Obama has the advantage of incumbency. This is huge.  Second, the press has been supportive of Obama and that will continue.  Third, the economic trends are improving to the advantage of Obama.

Economic conditions are very poor, but the simple fact is that the trends are good.

Unemployment has fallen from 10% to 8.5% over the past year and payroll gains are likely every month from now until the election. 

Real GDP is steadily rising.  Not booming of course, but by November it will have been three years since there was a negative number in real GDP.

The stock market has been already rallying for three years.  The rally is likely to continue, and it is even possible that by November the talking heads on CNBC will notice that stock prices are up.

An improvement in the economic trends may well provide Obama with the opportunity to argue that he inherited a difficult situation and, much as Reagan was able to do, convince voters to stay the course.

Obama is a 56%-44% favorite for re-election on the intrade.com site.  That seems reasonable.

Congress

The Republicans will hold the House of Representatives even if Obama wins re-election.

The GOP currently holds a 242-193 advantage in the House.  The Democrats would need to pick up 25 seats to take control.  That is extremely unlikely.

Americans are heavily inclined to vote for incumbents except in times of massive change.  An Obama re-election hardly qualifies as such.

Furthermore, the Republicans oversaw reapportionment in many key states.  In Pennsylvania, Ohio, North Carolina, Georgia, Texas, Michigan, Florida, Wisconsin, and other states, the Republicans drew the congressional lines.  This is an advantage that is almost impossible to overstate.

Being the party with a strong majority in the House, the new lines were generally not drawn to give the Republicans opportunities to gain seats.  Instead, the lines were drawn to strengthen incumbents. 

This, along with extremely high re-election rates for incumbents, means that the Republicans will easily hold the House.  The highly regarded Cook Political analysis (http://cookpolitical.com/charts/house/competitive_2012-01-19_13-37-44.php) shows only 30 Republican seats at risk, while Democrats have 23 seats at risk with five of those likely to be Republican.

The Senate

The Republicans are likely to pick up Senate seats and will probably take control of that chamber.

The Senate is currently 53 Democrats and 47 Republicans.  The Republicans need four seats to take control.  That happens to be our exact forecast. 

Senate elections tend to be tied far less to national trends than House elections.  They are more a function of the State's political leanings, whether there is an incumbent, and the strength of individual candidates.  The Republicans have large advantages.

The Democrats have 23 seats to defend, while the Republicans only have 10.

In eight states, the Democrats are defending seats in a Republican-leaning state.  In six, Democrats have retired.  The specifics are as follows. 

The Republicans are likely to take the following seats:

  1. North Dakota, a heavily GOP state in which the Democrat Senator has retired.
  2. Nebraska, a heavily GOP state in which the Democrat Senator has retired.
  3. Montana, a heavily GOP seat in which the first-term Democrat Senator beat a highly-damaged incumbent 51-49 last election.
  4. Missouri, a GOP leaning state in which the first-term Democrat Senator won 50-47 last election and will face a strong opponent.
  5. Wisconsin, a GOP leaning state in which the Democrat has retired and the GOP has stronger candidates.

The Democrats are likely to take:

  1. Massachusetts, a heavily Democrat state in which a Republican squeaked in through a special election. 

There is a long way to go, and these predictions are tentative, but they show that the Republicans are much better situated than Democrats heading into this cycle.

Additionally, while the Republicans may not take Wisconsin, the GOP also has excellent prospects in Virginia (where the Democrat is retiring), and decent prospects in Ohio, Florida, Hawaii, and New Mexico.  The Democrats' only chance to gain a seat other than Massachusetts is in Nevada.

The odds favor the Republicans.

What It All Means

First, the hyperventilation over each primary shouldn't concern investors.  The matter will soon be cleared up, and Romney remains a very strong favorite to win the Republican nomination.  Romney is probably better for financial markets than Gingrich.

Second, Obama is a favorite for re-election.  National discontent is very high and economic problems remain serious.  Nevertheless, the Republicans don't have a strong candidate in either Romney or Gingrich, and economic trends will steadily support Obama.

Third, the Republicans will hold at least one, and probably both, chambers of Congress after the next election.

This means that continued gridlock is likely.  Whether that is good or bad for the financial markets is debatable.  To many, it will be seen as bad, because there will be continued talk that Washington is incapable of solving problems.  To some, it may seem beneficial if a rising economy lifts tax revenue over time and a Republican congress holds the line on new spending programs.

--Dick Green, Briefing.com

The impact of the South Carolina primary results are being blown way out of proportion by the media's need for up-to-the-second over-analyzing. Mitt
 
Add this to my Page Alerts.
MARKET PLACE
SPONSORED LINKS
 
  Follow Us On Linkedin  
 
 
LOGIN

CONTACT US
Support
Sitemap
PREMIUM SERVICES
Take a Tour
Compare Services

INSTITUTIONAL SALES
ADVERTISING

CONTENT LICENSING

EMAILS & NEWSLETTERS
ABOUT US
Our Experts
Management Team

COMMUNITY
MEDIA
Events
News
Awards
PRIVACY STATEMENT
Reader Agreement
Policies
Disclaimer
Copyright © Briefing.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Close
You must log in or register to access this area.
Virtual Url Page Popup