You must subscribe to access archives older
than one year.
Take a free trial of Briefing In Play® now.
Subscribe Here
TERMS OF USE

The Briefing.com RSS (really simple syndication) service is a method by which we offer story headline feeds in XML format to readers of the Briefing.com web site who use RSS aggregators. By using Briefing.com’s RSS service you agree to be bound by these Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the terms and conditions contained in these Terms of Use, we do not consent to provide you with an RSS feed and you should not make use of Briefing.com’s RSS service. The use of the RSS service is also subject to the terms and conditions of the Briefing.com Reader Agreement which governs the use of Briefing.com's entire web site (www.briefing.com) including all information services. These Terms of Use and the Briefing.com Reader Agreement may be changed by Briefing.com at any time without notice.

Use of RSS Feeds:
The Briefing.com RSS service is provided free of charge for use by individuals, as long as the feeds are used for such individual’s personal, non-commercial use. Any other uses, including without limitation the incorporation of advertising into or the placement of advertising associated with or targeted towards the RSS Content, are strictly prohibited. You are required to use the RSS feeds as provided by Briefing.com and you may not edit or modify the text, content or links supplied by Briefing.com. To acquire more extensive licensing rights to Briefing.com content please review this page.

Link to Content Pages:
The RSS service may be used only with those platforms from which a functional link is made available that, when accessed, takes the viewer directly to the display of the full article on the Briefing.com web site. You may not display the RSS content in a manner that does not permit successful linking to, redirection to or delivery of the applicable Briefing.com web site page. You may not insert any intermediate page, “splash” page or any other content between the RSS link and the applicable Briefing.com web site page.

Ownership/Attribution:
Briefing.com retains all ownership and other rights in the RSS content, and any and all Briefing.com logos and trademarks used in connection with the RSS service. You are required to provide appropriate attribution to the Briefing.com web site in connection with your use of the RSS feeds. If you provide this attribution using a graphic we require you to use the Briefing.com web site logo that we have incorporated into the Briefing.com RSS feed.

Right to Discontinue Feeds:
Briefing.com reserves the right to discontinue providing any or all of the RSS feeds at any time and to require you to cease displaying, distributing or otherwise using any or all of the RSS feeds for any reason including, without limitation, your violation of any provision of these Terms of Use or the terms and conditions of the Briefing.com Reader Agreement. Briefing.com assumes no liability for any of your activities in connection with the RSS feeds or for your use of the RSS feeds in connection with your web site.

Briefing.com
Subscribers Log In
 
  • HOME
  • OUR VIEW
    • Page One
    • The Big Picture
    • Ahead of the Curve
  • ANALYSIS
    • Premium Analysis
    • Story Stocks
  • MARKETS
    • Stock Market Update
    • Bond Market Update
    • Market Internals
    • After Hours Report
    • Weekly Wrap
  • CALENDARS
    • Upgrades/Downgrades
    • Economic
    • Stock Splits
    • IPO
    • Earnings
    • Conference Calls
    • Earnings Guidance
  • EMAILS
    • Edit My Profile
  • LEARNING CENTER
    • About Briefing.com
    • Ask An Analyst
    • Analysis
    • General Concepts
    • Strategies
    • Resources
    • Video
  • COMMUNITY
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • SEARCH
Login | Archive | EmailEmail |
HOME > Our View >Ahead Of The Curve >The Conflicting Data In The...
Ahead Of The Curve Archive
Last Update: 14-Dec-12 15:41 ET
Free Trial of Briefing In Play
The Conflicting Data In The Employment Report

Last week’s employment report for November was almost universally proclaimed as positive and a sign that the economy is improving.  However, the report actually contained a large number of contradictions, as the unemployment survey showed a decline in jobs of 122,000, which conflicts with both the employment survey showing an increase and the decrease of the unemployment rate.  Here is a deeper look at the employment data. 

Major Points Of This Article

Here is a list of the major points discussed: 

  • The Establishment survey data conflicts with the Household Survey data
  • The Establishment survey showed an increase of 141,000 jobs
  • The Household survey shows a decrease of 122,000 jobs
  • The Household survey shows a decrease in the employed, but also a decrease in the unemployed, at 229,00 fewer “unemployed” 
  • The “Not In The Labor Force, but Want A Job Now” category, not included in the unemployment rate calculation, increased sharply this month, at 230,000

As the above points illustrate, this month’s report is a mix of contradictions. 

These points are discussed below 

The Labor Department Surveys

There are two surveys conducted by the Labor Department that constitute the non-farm payroll report.  

The first is the establishment survey, which surveys professional businesses and breaks down employment by the type of establishment and the sector in which it operates. This survey only counts the number of people currently working. 

The second is the household survey, which is a much smaller survey, but is used to calculate the number of people who are unemployed, as well as estimating the number of people that are employed. 

In addition, the household survey calculates the number of people who are “not in the labor force,” meaning those people who are neither working nor looking for a job. 

To be counted as “unemployed” in the household survey, a person must have actively looked for work in the past four weeks. An unemployed person who has not looked for work is considered to be “not in the labor force.” 

It is the household survey that is used to calculate the “unemployment rate.” 

The establishment survey is used to calculate the “number of jobs.” 

This makes the employment data more complex than  most of the simplified news stories in the mass media.  

Because of the different methodologies and sample sizes, the two surveys can show seemingly different information.

This is what happened this month, which also happened last month. 

November 2012 Employment Data - Contradictions In The Surveys 

The November Household survey showed the following trends this month. 

 

Metric (K) September October November Nov Change
Jobs
133,568

133,706
133,852


146,000

Employed
142,974



143,384


143,262
-122,000

Unemployed
12,088

12,258
12,029
-229,000

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 

This table shows a clear contradiction in the employment data, as the Establishment survey shows an increase of 146,000 jobs, while the Household survey shows a decline of 122,000. 

The difference in the total number of jobs shown in the two surveys is because the Household survey includes self-employed workers, while the Establishment survey includes only those employed by a business. 

One interpretation might be that many self-employed persons have given up their businesses and become employees, yet such an interpretation isn’t presented in any mass media discussion of jobs. 

Another viewpoint is that both numbers are within the realm of the “margin of error,” particularly the Establishment report, where the current month and the previous month are both preliminary and subject to revision. 

Household Survey Data – First Contradiction – Fewer Jobs, But Lower Unemployment Rate

The Household survey shows a decrease in employment, but also a decrease in the unemployment rate, from October's 7.9% level to 7.7%. 

How can this be? 

The unemployment rate is calculated by taking the number of unemployed persons and dividing it by the labor force number, which is the total of employed and unemployed, as shown below: 

Unemployment Rate = (Unemployed)  / (Employed + Unemployed) 

The unemployment rate calculation completely ignores those persons who are unemployed, but counted in the “Labor Force.” 

Since the Labor Force number declined by 350,00 people in November, the denominator in this calculation is smaller than the denominator used in last month’s calculation. 

The Household Survey Data Second Contradiction – Fewer Jobs, Fewer Unemployed 

The Household survey by itself also continues an apparently contradictory statistics as the number of jobs decreased, while the number of persons unemployed declined.

As can be seen in the previous table the number of persons employed fell by 122,000, while the number of unemployed persons rose by 129,000. 

How could this be?

The reason is that a third category of persons determined by the household survey,   called “Not In The Labor Force” increased sharply, by 542,000. Of these 230,000 are unemployed and want a job, but are not counted as unemployed by the BLS. 

The Not In The Labor Force Increase 

Persons are placed in the “not in the labor force”  are divided into two categories: 

  • Do not want a job (for example, retired)
  • Want a job 

The “Want a Job” category includes unemployed persons who have not looked for work in the past four weeks. 

Most people would include these long-term unemployed persons as “unemployed,” but the Household survey does not include those persons. 

Within the “Want A Job” category, there are two subcategories:

  • Want a job, but have not searched for work in the past year
  • Within the “Want A Job” category, there are two subcategories:

A further subcategory is the “Want a job, but have not searched in the past four weeks,” is the subcategory of “Discouraged.” 

These are workers who express the viewpoint that they reason they have stopped looking for a job is that they have given up all hope of finding a job, even though they want one. 

The following table shows the complete data for the November Household survey report. 


Household Survey Data, K



July


August


September


October


November


Nov Change

Labor Force

155,013 154,645 155,063 155,641 155,291 -350

Not In Labor Force
88,340 88,921 88,710 88,341 88,883 542

Employed

142,220 142,101 142,974 143,384 143,262 -122

Unemployed

12,794 12,544 12,088 12,258 12,029 -229

Want A Job Now

6,554 6,957 6,727 6,587 6,817 230

Discouraged

852 844 802 813 979 166

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics 

As the above table shows, there is an incredibly large increase in the number of persons who are “Not In The Labor Force,” with 542,000 persons. 

Nearly half (42%) of these persons are persons who “want a job,” however. The increase in the “Not In The Labor Force” category cannot be attributed solely to “baby boomers retiring,” as some in the media have suggested.  

The increase of those persons unemployed, but want a job now, was 230,000. 

This increase of the number of persons in the “not in the labor force, but want a job” is larger than both the increase in jobs reported by the Establishment survey and the decrease in the unemployed in the Household survey. 

In other words, the number of persons who have “dropped out” of the employment picture is the single largest number in the November report. 

But you won’t find that number discussed in any of the mass media reports on employment. 

Discouraged Workers 

A subcategory of the Not In Labor Force, but Want A Job Now Is The Discouraged worker category. 

These are people who are unemployed, but have completely given up hope of ever finding a job. 

This category increased in November by 166,000 persons in November, a number greater than any other number in the report; higher than the number of new jobs (146,000), higher than the decrease in unemployed persons (129,000). 

Conclusions

The November jobs reports are filled with conflicting data.  

There are data points to show increased negative environment in the employment world, as well as strong data points to show positive aspects of employment. 

Ironically, this makes the report more powerful politically, instead of less insightful, as persons can pick and choose whatever data points 

However, the simplest data points show positive improvement, while the more detailed analysis shows offsetting negative developments. 

Keep this in mind while you view analysis of various media’s reports on the economy. 

Comments may be emailed to the author, Robert V. Green, at aheadofthecurve@briefing.com 


Last week’s employment report for November was almost universally proclaimed as positive and a sign that the economy is improving. However,
 
Add this to my Page Alerts.
MARKET PLACE
SPONSORED LINKS
 
  Follow Us On Linkedin  
 
 
LOGIN

CONTACT US
Support
Sitemap
PREMIUM SERVICES
Take a Tour
Compare Services
Custom Tickers
INSTITUTIONAL SALES
ADVERTISING

CONTENT LICENSING

EMAILS & NEWSLETTERS
ABOUT US
Our Experts
Management Team

COMMUNITY
MEDIA
Events
News
Awards
PRIVACY STATEMENT
Reader Agreement
Policies
Disclaimer
Copyright © Briefing.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Close
You must log in or register to access this area.
Tip of the Day
Virtual Url Page Popup