You must subscribe to access archives older
than one year.
Take a free trial of Briefing In Play® now.
Subscribe Here
TERMS OF USE

The Briefing.com RSS (really simple syndication) service is a method by which we offer story headline feeds in XML format to readers of the Briefing.com web site who use RSS aggregators. By using Briefing.com’s RSS service you agree to be bound by these Terms of Use. If you do not agree to the terms and conditions contained in these Terms of Use, we do not consent to provide you with an RSS feed and you should not make use of Briefing.com’s RSS service. The use of the RSS service is also subject to the terms and conditions of the Briefing.com Reader Agreement which governs the use of Briefing.com's entire web site (www.briefing.com) including all information services. These Terms of Use and the Briefing.com Reader Agreement may be changed by Briefing.com at any time without notice.

Use of RSS Feeds:
The Briefing.com RSS service is provided free of charge for use by individuals, as long as the feeds are used for such individual’s personal, non-commercial use. Any other uses, including without limitation the incorporation of advertising into or the placement of advertising associated with or targeted towards the RSS Content, are strictly prohibited. You are required to use the RSS feeds as provided by Briefing.com and you may not edit or modify the text, content or links supplied by Briefing.com. To acquire more extensive licensing rights to Briefing.com content please review this page.

Link to Content Pages:
The RSS service may be used only with those platforms from which a functional link is made available that, when accessed, takes the viewer directly to the display of the full article on the Briefing.com web site. You may not display the RSS content in a manner that does not permit successful linking to, redirection to or delivery of the applicable Briefing.com web site page. You may not insert any intermediate page, “splash” page or any other content between the RSS link and the applicable Briefing.com web site page.

Ownership/Attribution:
Briefing.com retains all ownership and other rights in the RSS content, and any and all Briefing.com logos and trademarks used in connection with the RSS service. You are required to provide appropriate attribution to the Briefing.com web site in connection with your use of the RSS feeds. If you provide this attribution using a graphic we require you to use the Briefing.com web site logo that we have incorporated into the Briefing.com RSS feed.

Right to Discontinue Feeds:
Briefing.com reserves the right to discontinue providing any or all of the RSS feeds at any time and to require you to cease displaying, distributing or otherwise using any or all of the RSS feeds for any reason including, without limitation, your violation of any provision of these Terms of Use or the terms and conditions of the Briefing.com Reader Agreement. Briefing.com assumes no liability for any of your activities in connection with the RSS feeds or for your use of the RSS feeds in connection with your web site.

Briefing.com
Subscribers Log In
 
  • HOME
  • OUR VIEW
    • Page One
    • The Big Picture
    • Ahead of the Curve
  • ANALYSIS
    • Premium Analysis
    • Story Stocks
  • MARKETS
    • Stock Market Update
    • Bond Market Update
    • Market Internals
    • After Hours Report
    • Weekly Wrap
  • CALENDARS
    • Upgrades/Downgrades
    • Economic
    • Stock Splits
    • IPO
    • Earnings
    • Conference Calls
    • Earnings Guidance
  • EMAILS
    • Edit My Profile
  • LEARNING CENTER
    • About Briefing.com
    • Ask An Analyst
    • Analysis
    • General Concepts
    • Strategies
    • Resources
    • Video
  • COMMUNITY
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • RSS
  • SEARCH
Login | EmailEmail |
HOME > Learning Center >Ask An Analyst >How/why do options market ...
Ask An Analyst
Q: How/why do options market makers pin stocks on expiration?

A: Great question. As many may have seen/heard, often times stocks have a tendency to "pin" to an option strike price on expiration, meaning the stock gravitates to a nearby strike as the close of expiration day trading approaches. This "pin" phenomenon arises from hedging pressures, which can create increased demand for the underlying stock below the strike price and increased supply above the strike, as traders and market makers buy or sell stock to offset expiring option positions. These pressures push the stock toward the strike price as the close of expiration draws nearer.

To explain further, first consider that if an option expires in-the-money, it will be the equivalent of either owning 100 shares of the underlying stock (in the case of a call option) or being short 100 shares of the underlying stock (in the case of a put option). If the option expires out-of-money, it is worthless and equivalent to having no position in the underlying stock. When a stock is near a strike price with significant open interest (a large number of open options contracts), the market makers with large inventories of contracts at that particular strike are faced with the problem of hedging an uncertain position that can quickly change from being long/short 100 shares of stock to long/short 0 shares of stock, depending on whether the underlying stock closes above or below the strike price. Depending on the dynamics of the open interest at the strike (whether there is concentrated long/short positions on the call or put side), this can lead to heavy selling above the strike and buying below the strike, which can in turn "pin" the stock to the strike.

Since this can be a confusing topic when trying to conceptualize the different scenarios, let's walk through a hypothetical example. Let's consider Aflac (AFL) which closed at 45.01 on June expiration (6/17). Pretend that as a market maker you owned 1000 June 45 call options. With June expiration approaching, you know that a close above $45 will leave you long 100,000 shares of stock (100 shares per options contract), while a close below $45 will leave you with no position in the stock -- two drastically different positions. As a market maker, you don't want any exposure to the underlying stock, so you need to hedge the position accordingly. This means that as AFL moves above $45, you'll be selling stock to offset the chance of being long at expiration, and below $45, you're buying it back. A similar situation would exist if you were long 1000 puts, as you'd be short 100,000 shares below the strike, and flat above the strike creating the same type of hedging situation. A less certain situation exists with a short options position, as it is unclear what portion of the short contracts would be exercised when the stock is near the strike (whereas you control the exercise of the long options position).

Hopefully the example above demonstrates the type of hedging pressures that arise around expiration. When there is a large open interest and/or large inventory concentrations, these pressures may be exerted by many participants, which can push the stock closer and closer to the strike as the close of expiration day trading approaches.

Chris Borgmeyer, CFA
Director of Live Analysis

MARKET PLACE
SPONSORED LINKS
 
  Follow Us On Linkedin  
 
 
LOGIN

CONTACT US
Support
Sitemap
PREMIUM SERVICES
Take a Tour
Compare Services
Custom Tickers
INSTITUTIONAL SALES
ADVERTISING

CONTENT LICENSING

EMAILS & NEWSLETTERS
ABOUT US
Our Experts
Management Team

COMMUNITY
MEDIA
Events
News
Awards
PRIVACY STATEMENT
Reader Agreement
Policies
Disclaimer
Copyright © Briefing.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
Close
You must log in or register to access this area.
Tip of the Day